Merseyside Division 2

Report for the AGM

Merseyside Chess Association

Division 2

In the end Formby were comfortable and deserved winners – bouncing back to the top flight at the first attempt. It was not completely straightforward though. At Christmas they were 3 points clear and looking safe but a loss against their nearest rivals, Widnes , caused a few moments of anxiety – with 3 matches to go the gap was only 2 points. However, Formby finished in style with 3 straight wins while the other contenders faltered and at the finish they were 5 points clear. They may need, though, to improve their squad to survive in Division 1 after the lamented departure of their Board1, Peter Bond. However, that is for next year – for this year it is congratulations to Formby, worthy winners of Division2.

Widnes had an excellent season and from last year’s consolidation of 2nd from bottom they became this year’s 2nd from top. Although they may be slightly disappointed at not getting closer to the winners (especially losing late in the season against EEC when the latter had 2 defaulted boards), they did give them a run for their money and have made impressive progress in just 12 months. With an anticipated strengthening of their squad they will be very strong contenders for promotion next season.

Southport seem to be perpetually the bridesmaid rather than the bride and again they were comfortably placed near to the top of the table but never close enough to really challenge the leaders. On the other hand relegation is never something for them to worry about and so they can just enjoy their chess without the anxieties suffered by other clubs – a nice position to be in.

EEC started off slowly but gradually improved as the season progressed. At Christmas they were 6th, at Easter 5th and in the final outturn 4th. They were unable to mount the challenge for promotion that they had in previous years but again were in no real danger of joining the dog fight at the bottom. One suspects a similar outlook for next year.

A finish of 5th would have seemed fantasy for Wallasey B at Christmas when they had only 2 points. Relegation loomed very large over them but whatever they had for Christmas did them the power of good. In the second half of the season there was an amazing transformation and 5 wins from 7 matches (with the only losses being against the top 2 teams) moved them away from bottom place and in the end they were 6 points clear. Which Wallasey B will we see next season – the relegation form of the start or the promotion form of the finish?

The other team from Wallasey, the C Team, had a Christmas that disagreed with them. In the first half of the season they were nicely placed with a 50% score but the second half saw them pick up only 3 points. This was, however, enough to keep them clear of the perils of the relegation place. The youth of their top 2 boards should help them to improve next year.

Atticus 3 had a season that was almost the mirror image of Wallasey B. At Christmas they had 8 points and perhaps a challenge for the title was not impossible. However, 4 straight defeats saw them drift downwards and at Easter they were only 2 points off the bottom. They did rally to achieve their only win, indeed their only points, of the second half of the season with a crucial win at Liverpool that in the end ensured their safety. How they will fare next year will as always depend upon the demands upon their squad of their 1st and 2nd teams.

The fate of Liverpool 2, perhaps again shows that there is a significant step up to be made for promoted teams. They had come up from the 3rd Division in some style but ended up bottom of the 2nd by a clear 4 points. It had started brightly with a 6½-½ thumping of Wallasey B in the first fixture but that was then their only win until they achieved their other one in mid March – but then came that vital loss against Atticus 3 that was to prove the final nail in the coffin. So too strong for Division 3 but not strong enough for Division 2 but the team will benefit from the experience at the higher level.

Player of the Year

At the time of producing this report, there is uncertainty about the final outcome of the Player of the Year award. Paul Stephenson of Liverpool has at least a share of the title but Steve Potter of Widnes may join him if an appeal is successful. The rankings shown are as they stand prior to the appeal and so this report is based on the prevailing position.

For a large part of the year, the award seemed to be a 2 horse race, neck and neck between Paul Stephenson and Chino Atako of Atticus. At the half way point there was only ½ a point between them. By Easter, though, Chino had slipped back after a defeat and then, although he later beat Paul in their individual encounter, he crucially missed 3 matches and fell away. Paul looked to have the award comfortably sewn up but then his loss against Chino and also missing the last match of the season gave a possible opening. Steve Potter came through like a train and after Christmas had a 100% record where he had an opponent but unfortunately on 2 occasions he had no one to play and through no fault of his own missed the chance of an outright win of the award. The appeal is about one of these ‘no shows’ and therefore I will comment no further except to commend Steve for an outstanding season and to say that as it stands he is on 10 points from 14 matches. Also, mention should go to Andrew Smith of Formby who came through in the final matches to finish on 9½ points, just one behind the leader.

Congratulations, therefore, go to Paul Stephenson with 10½ points from 13 games. As has been mentioned at previous AGMs the achievement is so much the greater when all the matches are played on top board. It is also remarkable that the team that finished bottom of the league had the Player of the Year on Board 1.  

Please note that following a decision of the League Management Committee, Steve Potters appeal was upheld and so he is Joint Player of the Year - congratulations also therefore to Steve - it was well deserved.

- - - - - - - - - -

I have enjoyed my first season as a divisional controller and would like to thank the captains for their speedy return of score cards. This enabled me to keep the website up to date for most of the season – at least until the vital positions had been decided. The site seemed to be well received and I will continue with it next year with a few improvements

   

Dave Farley

Division 2 Home